From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Apr 3 14:39:26 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from pogo.caustic.org (caustic.org [64.163.147.186]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D2C37B400 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 14:39:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (jan@localhost) by pogo.caustic.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g33MdKp31618; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 14:39:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jan@caustic.org) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 14:39:20 -0800 (PST) From: "f.johan.beisser" To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: Pete Ehlke , Subject: Re: Anti-Unix Site Runs Unix In-Reply-To: <008801c1db5d$89854aa0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Message-ID: <20020403142648.S96787-100000@pogo.caustic.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > > http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f3800/msjudgex.htm#v > > I don't see any timeline in there, just a hundred pages of running text. > No need for a personal attack. You can admit that you there really isn't a > timeline in that document, and you just threw it out in the hope that I'd be > intimidated. But now I'm calling your bluff. Where's the timeline? As a > matter of fact, I don't think you've even read that document. Prove me > wrong, and point out the timeline. looks to me like it's there, just a matter of looking for it. yes, it's a large, and rather intimidating document, something i've never really bothered to read, beyond the usual summeries. as pointed out to you with the URL: V. MICROSOFT'S RESPONSE TO THE BROWSER THREAT A. Microsoft's Attempt to Dissuade Netscape from Developing Navigator as a Platform 79. Microsoft's first response to the threat posed by Navigator was an effort to persuade Netscape to structure its business such that the company would not distribute platform- level browsing software for Windows. Netscape's assent would have ensured that, for the foreseeable future, Microsoft would produce the only platform-level browsing software distributed to run on Windows. This would have eliminated the prospect that non-Microsoft browsing software could weaken the applications barrier to entry. paragraphs 68 to 89 are fairly interesting reading, as are Sections B, and C of part V. and yeah, it looks like a timeline to me. perhaps you wanted one that's graphical? -------/ f. johan beisser /--------------------------------------+ http://caustic.org/~jan jan@caustic.org "John Ashcroft is really just the reanimated corpse of J. Edgar Hoover." -- Tim Triche To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message