From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 22 03:36:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A242616A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 03:36:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (newtrinity.zeist.de [217.24.217.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C9A43D55 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 03:36:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) j1M3aCeF037517; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 04:36:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by newtrinity.zeist.de (8.12.11/8.12.10/Submit) id j1M3a6oF037516; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 04:36:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 04:36:06 +0100 From: Marius Strobl To: Michael Nottebrock Message-ID: <20050222043606.C18907@newtrinity.zeist.de> References: <20050221115057.43c7iqxq8w8g8gkg@mail.ebfoto.com.br> <20050221230509.B18907@newtrinity.zeist.de> <200502220346.54044.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200502220346.54044.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>; from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net on Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 03:46:49AM +0100 X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1.0-3; AVE: 6.29.0.16; VDF: 6.29.0.140; host: newtrinity.zeist.de) cc: Ivo Roumenov Tonev cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cdrtools-2.01 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 03:36:14 -0000 On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 03:46:49AM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Monday, 21. February 2005 23:05, Marius Strobl wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 11:50:57AM -0300, Ivo Roumenov Tonev wrote: > > > Patch for DVD writing > > > > > > can include it in the port? > > > > No, sorry, the author of cdrecord regards the inclusion of such patches > > as a violation of the cdrecord license > > The 'cdrecord license' is the GPL, it would be pretty bad for us if we (or > anyone) couldn't distribute binaries of patched, GPL'd software. > It's the GPL + a couple of additional restrictions (e.g. one must not change tests in the configure script) + a "clarification text" about how to interpret certain parts of the GPL for cdrecord. I don't support his view of the GPL but I think we really shouldn't patch cdrecord in a way the author clearly objects to. Please also see his recent mail on hackers@: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2005-February/010317.html Marius