From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue May  2 19:57:01 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id TAA25297
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 2 May 1995 19:57:01 -0700
Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.1])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA25282
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 2 May 1995 19:56:54 -0700
Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin.Root.COM [198.145.90.18]) by Root.COM (8.6.8/8.6.5) with ESMTP id TAA29430; Tue, 2 May 1995 19:56:48 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.11/8.6.5) with SMTP id TAA00161; Tue, 2 May 1995 19:56:48 -0700
Message-Id: <199505030256.TAA00161@corbin.Root.COM>
To: Robert Withrow <witr@rwwa.com>
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: BPF nonfunctional? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 02 May 95 22:40:22 EDT."
             <199505030240.WAA00457@rwwa.com> 
From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM
Date: Tue, 02 May 1995 19:56:47 -0700
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>Is it safe to say the BPF is not-ready-for-prime-time in
>FBSD2.0R?  When I compile it in my networking ceases to
>function...

   It worked okay for me...what type of ethernet card do you have?

-DG