From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 13 01:55:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBBC216A4D1 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 01:55:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB7C343D46 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 01:55:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 73C7C148EC; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 20:55:25 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 20:55:25 -0500 (CDT) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: Oliver Eikemeier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: FreeBSD ports cc: Chuck Swiger cc: Steven Hartland cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Email nagging, was: Re: Ports with version numbers goingbackwards: graphics/gd,japanese/gd, ukrain... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 01:55:27 -0000 On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > Not that I don't value the INDEX as a great QA tool, but I wonder why > lots of people need to build their own INDEX. Back before we had the daily builds and the 'make fetchindex' target, it was about the only way to keep that file up-to-date. Now it isn't, but probably most people don't know that yet. mcl