From owner-cvs-all Mon Apr 15 10: 1:19 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from patrocles.silby.com (d140.as14.nwbl0.wi.voyager.net [169.207.136.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD8C37B400; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 10:01:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from patrocles.silby.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by patrocles.silby.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g3FN0tLx006074; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 18:00:55 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: from localhost (silby@localhost) by patrocles.silby.com (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) with ESMTP id g3FN0iWd006071; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 18:00:54 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: patrocles.silby.com: silby owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 18:00:44 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack To: Peter Pentchev Cc: kde@FreeBSD.org, , Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet in.h In-Reply-To: <20020415170727.D5071-100000@patrocles.silby.com> Message-ID: <20020415175838.K5071-100000@patrocles.silby.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Mike Silbersack wrote: > They shouldn't need to specify a port range; simply using an ephemeral > port should work more than adequately. > > In the meantime, defining IPPORT_USERRESERVED = 5000 in that game is the > best patch. > > Mike "Silby" Silbersack Ok, I took a quick look at it. I don't feel like figuring out which class actually handles port selection, so a simple patch looks like the best answer. Now that I've seen the code, I believe that going with your original patch is the best option, please go ahead and commit that to the port. Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message