From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Nov 15 07:55:31 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD46FDD43E2 for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 07:55:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5118C1D0D; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 07:55:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id vAF7tIF3059123; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 18:55:18 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 18:55:18 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Kurt Lidl cc: Cos Chan , freebsd-questions , Michael Ross Subject: Re: How to setup IPFW working with blacklistd In-Reply-To: <7961d19a-bc0c-6dc4-771e-f702ce741144@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: <20171115184724.R72828@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20171106235944.U9710@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20171107033226.M9710@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20171107162914.G9710@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20171108012948.A9710@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20171111213759.I72828@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <7961d19a-bc0c-6dc4-771e-f702ce741144@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 07:55:32 -0000 On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:37:46 -0500, Kurt Lidl wrote: > Greetings all! Welcome Kurt, very glad you're here! > Sorry for not being response to your request for help sooner. > > I had a bit of a hardware crisis here last week, where > what I thought was merely a blown power supply turned > out to be a failed motherboard. Getting the 2.5" SAS > drives back up and running in a different machine took > far longer than I would have guessed. That, along with > a secondary MX host that was offline for the first 36 > hours after the main mail server went down was a cause > for additional excitement. Sounds like lots of fun, and certainly explains the mail problems. > Anyway. > > I've read through the mail exchange, although its a bit > hard to follow all of it. It is, and a lot of that's my fault for speculating in your absense, however I do find this an interesting gadget, even though I'm not likely to be running an 11.x system in the foreseeable future. I'll get back to the rest of your observations after replying to a couple of Cos' messages first - as briefly as possible! cheers, Ian