From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Mon Apr 20 10:06:20 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E01302BDB4A for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 10:06:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jtubnor@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi1-f175.google.com (mail-oi1-f175.google.com [209.85.167.175]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 495MmC3KCRz446N for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 10:06:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jtubnor@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi1-f175.google.com with SMTP id o7so6498785oif.2 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 03:06:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=vMDbGqeL46D96rLYlZWHJuPKJUr1xnXTcESu7s0luPw=; b=itPaUeOUqxnM4y5FJJ3rT+N2MaKaLSoP2y4P6WMxsb5WnQtfI3GyuqlQA+3IWqicZY Wi3OESQNvA1MH2h3cZ9Qu/7MD5r7rTsMogU/Ntq8Br8iM4tlGcYf50WYLVTZs6bveE18 WhjM8ni/wtQcUcs53IkrjVrISCADPLpHnPlKyJniN7u1xjTbN45Lzo7cgWGq6ks5Wcg2 iVGZx7MA5ROCEpqum2VedilCP6uGQGx948mKbW+kNWTDCJ+XLZRJQQMZg/5Wiu+MZAnO dWkKf8rU8QvHGjCo47yaKpM6qq5JskN8w0AG325TgqoWINGxMP4ssF7von6mA1+bmRln +Ltw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYm5s7tkduMxDe4B3hnnbipeiSd1sSmdSgtPlomKmxBfHhyYkIH Vzn2OschFSYIFwIglepg26P+zhXCp8Ovb1UNUOQ8fXXN X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypL0MFrJqHbOdtTn+xrXLPX6GbDOgYcH2LuchJNf6/NPRC4/IFTRj3Goz/Qk2X5hDpeUHHh0vdIXtoivYyCzsXc= X-Received: by 2002:aca:d06:: with SMTP id 6mr9313404oin.78.1587377177958; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 03:06:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <9e7f4c01-6cd1-4045-1a5b-69c804b3881b@omnilan.de> <20200419172345.Horde.alwm2Bn67wrcUt5a0zVjQ9f@app.eeeit.de> <69553fba-4ee5-67dc-a052-b58bb8100061@netfence.it> <20200420090934.d6gkjg5er5ij36d2@nexus.home.palmen-it.de> In-Reply-To: <20200420090934.d6gkjg5er5ij36d2@nexus.home.palmen-it.de> From: Jason Tubnor Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 20:06:07 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bhyve win-guest benchmark comparing To: FreeBSD virtualization X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 495MmC3KCRz446N X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jtubnor@gmail.com designates 209.85.167.175 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jtubnor@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.22 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.997,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[tubnor.net]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[175.167.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-0.23)[ip: (-0.27), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-0.40), asn: 15169(-0.43), country: US(-0.05)]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[jason@tubnor.net,jtubnor@gmail.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[175.167.85.209.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[jason@tubnor.net,jtubnor@gmail.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 10:06:20 -0000 On Mon., 20 Apr. 2020, 7:09 pm Felix Palmen, wrote: > > > Xeon are not affected, since they have vAPIC, so they should be already > > running as fast as possible. Correct? > > I don't know the details, but on my Xeon E3-1240L v5, it did have a huge > effect. > > > ^^^ This. Not all Xeon CPUs have vAPIC, especially the cheaper or workstation class so this may end up benefitting a lot of users. It turned our windows guest in their 1ru Xeon hosts into a different beast instantly. Cheers, Jason