From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May  5 09:31:01 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E691137B401
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  5 May 2003 09:31:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.netcologne.de (smtp1.netcologne.de [194.8.194.112])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 263C543FBD
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  5 May 2003 09:31:01 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from tmseck-usenet@netcologne.de)
Received: from laurel.tmseck.homedns.org (xdsl-213-196-195-71.netcologne.de
	[213.196.195.71])
	by smtp1.netcologne.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 205F838B0A
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  5 May 2003 18:30:58 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (qmail 16045 invoked by uid 1001); 5 May 2003 16:31:23 -0000
Date: 5 May 2003 16:31:23 -0000
Message-ID: <20030505163123.16044.qmail@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org>
From: tmseck-lists@netcologne.de (Thomas Seck)
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Organization: private site
In-Reply-To: <20030505152136.GB31920@rot13.obsecurity.org>
X-Newsgroups: gmane.os.freebsd.current
X-Attribution: tms
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
Subject: Re: HEADS UP! Kerberos5/Heimdal now default!
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 16:31:02 -0000

* Kris Kennaway (kris@obsecurity.org):

> On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 02:29:45PM -0000, Thomas Seck wrote:

>> I can live with a 'NO_KERBEROS' make option.
>> 
>> Having the kerberos stuff in a separate tarball and de-selectable in
>> sysinstall is enough to 'satisfy' my needs. I wonder why Kerberos was
>> always part of the default installation set anyway?
> 
> With recent changes, Kerberos is no longer separate or de-selectable
> from sysinstall, unless you also get rid of e.g. openssh.  That's part
> of what we're discussing.

So be it, I am not to decide whether this is 'A Good Thing'. And pardon 
me to have disturbed you 'while you were discussing'. It will not happen
again.

     --Thomas