From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct  1 15:42:41 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31C76337;
 Wed,  1 Oct 2014 15:42:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca
 [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "smarthost.sentex.ca", Issuer "smarthost.sentex.ca" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8A79A06;
 Wed,  1 Oct 2014 15:42:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a] (saphire3.sentex.ca
 [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a])
 by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s91FgdM8081474;
 Wed, 1 Oct 2014 11:42:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Message-ID: <542C20D7.3070606@sentex.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 11:42:15 -0400
From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Organization: Sentex Communications
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>, Rumen Telbizov <telbizov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 10.1-BETA2 possible kernel memory leak in routing table
References: <CAENR+_UVLDDrsef2W4CXCFX65EYaxeKN4MNWbgoyaZ5qDGe1Pg@mail.gmail.com>
 <542AAA3C.1080803@ipfw.ru>
 <CAENR+_X5KTdeb00f9NShN1YK+T2aY1vG5YcTCgu4aXZO=+pa=g@mail.gmail.com>
 <542AE376.6000003@FreeBSD.org>
 <CAENR+_XX4jnD6SBi8S1dGfWM68tmcm0aE2iMVA3LDR3R8ygQYw@mail.gmail.com>
 <542AFAE3.9030705@FreeBSD.org>
 <CAENR+_WbntqjE4b=iZS8z30AK7gSpur00HsWP9-T_UJ7OosU8Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20141001135124.GM73266@glebius.int.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20141001135124.GM73266@glebius.int.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75
Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>,
 "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@freebsd.org>, brian@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 15:42:41 -0000

On 10/1/2014 9:51 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 04:56:00PM -0700, Rumen Telbizov wrote:
> R> Brian Somers and I are currently looking into the source of PF in latest
> R> 10-STABLE and trying to figure out what is going on. We were able to
> R> replicate this problem on a 11-CURRENT (Sep 12th) machine as well. A simple
> R> PF ruleset with 1 rule and 1 table. Every few reloads of the firewall
> R> and vmstat
> R> -m | grep routetbl shows increased memory usage.
>
> I plugged the easy leak, but there is also a hard one. Actually, the
> entire pf_table.c needs a good shake. Right now I am out of time for this.
>

Hi,
	Is that easy fix

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/2014-October/063178.html

Also, is there any work around to this ?  I tried a simple set of pf 
rules with no tables, hoping that was the cause of it, but memory grows 
with each pf reload.

	---Mike


-- 
-------------------
Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400
Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net
Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net
Cambridge, Ontario Canada   http://www.tancsa.com/