Date: Tue, 07 Nov 1995 19:01:53 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (aka Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage) <ache@astral.msk.su> Cc: Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de>, FreeBSD hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Ack! Help, Andrey! I'm having troubles in libdialog! Message-ID: <2079.815799713@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 07 Nov 1995 22:46:19 %2B0300." <arBUxdmib6@ache.dialup.demos.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Better solution for it will be passing NULL pointer to dialog functions > because you not use result[] at all and make them understand NULL > pointer there. Well, while we're wishing here.. :-) A *far far* better solution would be to be able to add callbacks for each item created, then I'd never even need to parse that &%^%$*!! result string at all! The original dialog/libdialog was designed for use from shell scripts, and not from C. The shortcomings of this are obvious. Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2079.815799713>