From owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 15 23:04:32 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E01116A420 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 23:04:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@seaholm.caamora.com.au) Received: from seaholm.caamora.com.au (seaholm.caamora.com.au [203.7.226.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 537B913C46B for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 23:04:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@seaholm.caamora.com.au) Received: (from jon@localhost) by seaholm.caamora.com.au (8.11.1/8.11.1) id lAFMciU23657; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 09:38:44 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <20071116093844.38551@caamora.com.au> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 09:38:44 +1100 From: jonathan michaels To: Dirk-Willem van Gulik References: <1194819232.1047.19.camel@workstation.martenvijn.nl> <20071115013208.GA3497@kobe.laptop> <1195151049.3240.10.camel@workstation.martenvijn.nl> <20071115190615.GA2775@kobe.laptop> <473C99EA.2010501@webweaving.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.84e In-Reply-To: <473C99EA.2010501@webweaving.org>; from Dirk-Willem van Gulik on Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 08:11:38PM +0100 Organisation: Caamora, PO Box 144, Rosebery NSW 1445 Australia Cc: freebsd-small@freebsd.org, Giorgos Keramidas Subject: Re: tinybsd qemu small howto X-BeenThere: freebsd-small@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 23:04:32 -0000 greetings, On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 08:11:38PM +0100, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > > The wiki page is a good enough text as an initial mini-guide for > > tinybsd, but I think we can arrange it a bit, expand parts of it, > > and describe a few more tricks. sorry, for my silly question, but i thought that freebsd-small@ was discontinued/disbanded in favour off a new group called freebsd-embedded@ ?? if this is correct, would not this thread/dissussion be better held in that group or is there soem reason to have this discussin in thsi older/old group ?? i'm just a little more confused than usual .. grin. it would seem to make sence to have a wider target audience, it seems t me, or have i missed teh point or something like that ?? apologies if i have. should have i set teh reply-to: header to 'freebsd-embedded@' ?? most kind regards jonathan -- ================================================================ powered by .. QNX, OS9 and freeBSD -- http://caamora com au/operating system ==== === appropriate solution in an inappropriate world === ====