From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 26 18:40:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE9A8A0; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:40:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ben@b1c1l1.com) Received: from lancer.b1c1l1.com (lancer.b1c1l1.com [IPv6:2607:f358:1a:1a:1000::]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E65EE1808; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:40:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lancer.b1c1l1.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0A31B5C39; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 11:39:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=b1c1l1.com; s=default; t=1367001594; bh=mjxwRhdfGcfNWvQDTAiii/QQVMNAI1dI0LT7DZXLFyk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=IK8rbwhmDVMBWcjjw0oBPffbA6Z3xB9zV5dF6qFdpYHqywNFQ9+ilCsWnzd9P0qwI lJZlR1IIWYa21f6vyAg1v8eXnWog+neDXK0aT3BucN1VyPBGw6Xx+p8oxatnPvzvWC ll8amxs+jcueErRAjHrZnxJGtGcZM85lYIlyTJJs= Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 11:39:48 -0700 From: Benjamin Lee To: "Moore, Robert" Subject: Re: panic: acpi_pci_link_srs_from_crs: can't put non-ISA IRQ 20 in legacy IRQ resource type) Message-ID: <20130426113948.10b5400e@b1c1l1.com> In-Reply-To: <94F2FBAB4432B54E8AACC7DFDE6C92E36FE43F55@FMSMSX153.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <20130418124940.47e3618a@b1c1l1.com> <201304191726.31089.jhb@freebsd.org> <20130419152110.213c7fbb@b1c1l1.com> <201304200817.15189.jhb@freebsd.org> <20130421101728.6fc33a96@b1c1l1.com> <94F2FBAB4432B54E8AACC7DFDE6C92E36FE43F55@FMSMSX153.amr.corp.intel.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.17; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/rKA8.UnV9AqC75TlibC4AfP"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" , "Guan, Chao" , "Zheng, Lv" X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:40:01 -0000 --Sig_/rKA8.UnV9AqC75TlibC4AfP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 02:28:25 +0000, "Moore, Robert" wrote: > > Thank you! I backed out my hacks and with your 2 patches 10-CURRENT bo= ots > > successfully (with functional devices). Loading a custom ASL is not > > necessary. >=20 > Do you mean that the change of a WORD field to a BYTE field is no longer = necessary? >=20 > If so, I would really like to see the buffer that is being sent to _SRS. Yes, the change of WORD to BYTE is not necessary with 10-CURRENT. I don't understand ACPI well enough to answer your followup. All I know is that there is some change in the ACPI parsing behavior between 9-STABLE (which triggers AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT in the broken _SRS method) and 10-CURRENT (which used to panic but after jhb's fixes now boots correctly). Could it be possible that _SRS is not being called at all with the new ACPI code? --=20 Benjamin Lee http://www.b1c1l1.com/ --Sig_/rKA8.UnV9AqC75TlibC4AfP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJResn5AAoJEHpz6H1iC6qD3UMP/iU4UADsfi4EDpc9qsbfc1b9 AdsIolPA9EW7HR9ukVvKJwGA66FBD99BNZsV7i41IZAicXU9IwYTzRUGTJX+cbZR uG8egaDut9QPzLN8mlwoanVbyNOwcEmWCacYScbTtkoE2iyfLTzVPZy7uqJU3N3N EZHvz3FJfa5sXQ1FOeMdVW07Uj9LiGR/7YrkTCbjKTB9t0h9IEUPsnmJ5WeUuShW uBhnN9Q/vXw1hydiKzY+q7f9spiFi26UzzpOfdZkVDVtMn//PMJNiORKAytnFVUz s9N9xUJwmSmJP/VwEcNGZ+onqpQuEkYTtkeV97+yk3Ptb+IoKhOssW/xHlR/tUF5 OdzeAcH17bNEzzUzADS1WhnxB5K/utlm/EnpBUGDKJQOI4+gxi/wFZJtt4BEW6Kz 8f/nG9KbQxspGoiZSJ+krJpt9ILomteQ2AQJ7A0B97ncSRpmKxyJ7g4pyoDI0BUd KKjDX/k3iNFnFQCopw/5d3ubUEQeoc0OEBS486YVM2Q23hOZx02wmEW6w3KYelKv 7tIYdg0k0XHHXRUBUujG30RbeUgsq8J2qEyEAYWhyfUG1ShMpBIZM4t1ZS7/M8Kh 7bJuPSl9n5zeuPKadzgbxxevrbawLhrs5lR0Ma6a0Ismg+d4x+OVcyoFItE8o668 3bQQEsg3e3UfGbxiCh5K =n6vJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/rKA8.UnV9AqC75TlibC4AfP--