Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 12 Sep 2004 22:06:52 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Chris Pepper <pepper@reppep.com>
To:        FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        mirror-admin@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   ports/71692: portupgrade fails to find packages in ports/i386/packages-5-stable
Message-ID:  <20040913020652.6912811430@guest.reppep.com>
Resent-Message-ID: <200409130210.i8D2AKhD068322@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>Number:         71692
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       portupgrade fails to find packages in ports/i386/packages-5-stable
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    freebsd-ports-bugs
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Mon Sep 13 02:10:20 GMT 2004
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Chris Pepper <pepper@reppep.com>
>Release:        FreeBSD 5.3-BETA3 i386
>Organization:
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD guest.reppep.com 5.3-BETA3 FreeBSD 5.3-BETA3 #2: Fri Sep 10 04:50:36 EDT 2004 root@guest.reppep.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/REPPEP5 i386


	
>Description:
	portupgrade -PP kde tries to fetch a package from packages-5-stable, which isn't on the master or mirror sites.
	
>How-To-Repeat:
	
	portinstall -PP kde

	I see this failure:

--->  Fetching kde-3.3.0
fetch: ftp://freebsd.lcs.mit.edu/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5-stable/All/kde-3.3.0.tbz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access)
** The command returned a non-zero exit status: 1
** Failed to fetch ftp://freebsd.lcs.mit.edu/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5-stable/All/kde-3.3.0.tbz
fetch: ftp://freebsd.lcs.mit.edu/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5-stable/All/kde-3.3.0.tgz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access)
** The command returned a non-zero exit status: 1

>Fix:

	

	If portupgrade is right to think that FreeBSD 5.3-BETA3 (BETA2 with a cvsup on 09/10) is stable, then put packages or a symlink under packages-5-stable; if not, portupgrade is confused; if it's ambivalent, portupgrade should probably get a bit smarter, but I'm not sure which is best (or even true).
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040913020652.6912811430>