From owner-freebsd-arch Sat Jul 8 21: 7:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from berserker.bsdi.com (berserker.twistedbit.com [199.79.183.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E814A37BFF2; Sat, 8 Jul 2000 21:07:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cp@berserker.bsdi.com) Received: from berserker.bsdi.com (cp@[127.0.0.1]) by berserker.bsdi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA01726; Sat, 8 Jul 2000 22:07:07 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200007090407.WAA01726@berserker.bsdi.com> To: Brian Fundakowski Feldman Cc: Matthew Dillon , Marius Bendiksen , Alfred Perlstein , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Alterations to vops From: Chuck Paterson Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2000 22:07:07 -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Do you some how know that you are having to fill zero page faults from disk? Chuck ----- Begin Included Message ----- Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2000 21:55:09 -0400 From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman To: Matthew Dillon Subject: Re: Alterations to vops cc: Marius Bendiksen , Alfred Perlstein , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG I'm still missing something. Why does a process that isn't doing anything on the filesystem still freezing? My disks are DMA, so there shouldn't be any tim ethat the kernel is busy-waiting for a seek, right? You explained why the I/O from one process can totally destroy the I/O bandwidth of the other, thank you :), but I don't see how that relates to the other part of this problem. -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! / green@FreeBSD.org `------------------------------' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message ----- End Included Message ----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message