From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 19 11:13:59 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9E116A418 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:13:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grafan@gmail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967B513C448 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:13:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grafan@gmail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b27so3465536fka.11 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 03:13:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=bV12RKH3vYduJQGH07mgL7vtTff8mWHCZYXqnUI4hs4=; b=thQyIWmo3MI1yOcpPPmaPDqO5Bt8nFMywXY7koqKb7/mGHSt850tdxZi661mHJ4KijofmeaiZxGXa6b4Eh+u8Kk5BIaxG8RHAlBlV+zHEVgqIBGEmtEx/8mkdbAfdF9sIELYSH2eacpTkc1XSvyjb/+/VwPX+gEQyV6nZI9Purg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FNDVHxsVnoa1PHXchFVuMrzEW5UfiGkit7BbqaatWoLzFOuhHxVVDTwsLQT9hJvGNyO2XBcHozr7EwYMKxliQuTwCBd7xV9CKvmcTgjZGEPLlmqJn3XbWPEGaeXM+IAlj88O/KsXPtv7eYvAWCKPx0w/TFxLU4jpeDdBTfG4v8s= Received: by 10.82.134.12 with SMTP id h12mr9849330bud.29.1198061086388; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 02:44:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.116.17 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 02:44:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6eb82e0712190244p51042783vf8fd1d52a297c90d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:44:46 +0800 From: "Rong-en Fan" To: "Dominic Fandrey" In-Reply-To: <4767F263.2000708@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4767283D.70604@delphij.net> <20071218144900.M51742@FreeBSD.org> <4767F263.2000708@gmx.de> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Pav Lucistnik , d@delphij.net Subject: Re: ports.conf: Is there a reason behind not being default? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:13:59 -0000 On Dec 19, 2007 12:16 AM, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:54:05 -0800, Xin LI wrote > > > >> I think that ports-mgmt/portconf (a.k.a. /usr/local/etc/ports.conf) > >> is a very handy feature that makes it much easier to store port options > >> across upgrade. Is there a reason behind not making it into > >> bsd.ports.mk? IMHO it's a big deal to take the script into > >> ports/Tools/scripts, and move the configuration to somewhere like > >> /etc/ports.conf... > > > > I haven't checked it out yet. What can it do that can't be done in > > /etc/make.conf with constructs like > > > > .if ${.CURDIR} == "/usr/ports/editors/vim" > > WITH_GTK2=yes > > .endif > > > > ? > > Actually it can only do less than that (and it won't work if /usr/ports is a > symlink, at least the last time I checked). The only advantage is a more It can, see commit log http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/ports-mgmt/portconf/pkg-install Regards, Rong-En Fan > compact (and simple) syntax. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >