From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Jun 25 7:13:37 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA1614F68 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 07:13:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA02465 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 16:13:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id QAA25065 for emulation@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 16:13:32 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 16:13:32 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: BSDi syscall compatibility Message-ID: <19990625161332.A24989@bitbox.follo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I'm trying to run some BSDi executables (Shopsite) on -current and 3.1-stable, and I'm getting sig 10's (bus errors). Does anybody have a clue? The same executables run "fine" on 2.2.8-stable (modulo mmap bugs, which are a pain). -current source is from 19990615. 3.1-stable source is from 19990505. 2.2.8-stable source is from 19981217. This should be after the corrections for the kernel memory space increase, so that seems unlikely to be the reason. If necessary I'll start digging to find out just when it broke sometime next week, but any hint that could lead me to a better chase than that would be appreciated. Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message