From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 11 21:28:57 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0233D373; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 21:28:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF9DC2708; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 21:28:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C0EAEB968; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 17:28:55 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: "Andrey V. Elsukov" Subject: Re: svn commit: r269661 - head/sys/kern Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 12:25:35 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.4-CBSD-20140415; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <53e353b6.5aa8.4ee2421b@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <53e353b6.5aa8.4ee2421b@svn.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201408111225.35190.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Mon, 11 Aug 2014 17:28:55 -0400 (EDT) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 21:28:57 -0000 On Thursday, August 07, 2014 6:23:50 am Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > Author: ae > Date: Thu Aug 7 10:23:50 2014 > New Revision: 269661 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/269661 > > Log: > Use cpuset_setithread() to apply cpu mask to taskq threads. > > Sponsored by: Yandex LLC I think this is fine (sorry I didn't reply to your earlier mail). My one comment is we probably should rename cpuset_setithread() as it is now used for non-ithreads. I would suggest cpuset_setkthread(), but it isn't something all kthreads should use, so that isn't really correct either. Something along the lines of what it actually does (cpuset_privateset()) might be best? -- John Baldwin