Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 09 Nov 2022 12:42:18 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        enlightenment@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 267656] exclusive dependencies: luajit vs luajit-devel / enlightenment vs obs-studio
Message-ID:  <bug-267656-33756-B1w3hNW3Xl@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-267656-33756@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-267656-33756@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D267656

--- Comment #8 from Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Tomasz "CeDeROM" CEDRO from comment #7)
He's made it clear that he does not believe in releases anymore. The mainta=
iner
of luajit-devel, osa, does an excellent job of choosing upstream commit poi=
nts
to create FreeBSD "releases."

If you would like to urge upstream to make releases, go for it. I made the
decision that FreeBSD was better off facilitating a rolling release rather =
than
no releases at all.

What FreeBSD really needs is for the remaining luajit (or luajit-devel, or
luajit-openresty) hard-dependencies to be converted to USES=3Dluajit after
build/run testing. I've converted all the ports that I'm going to; the
remaining ports are left to interested parties.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-267656-33756-B1w3hNW3Xl>