From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 26 18:40:38 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA3A16A402
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 18:40:38 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com)
Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net
	[207.172.157.102])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D74613C48D
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 18:40:38 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com)
Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22])
	by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 26 Jan 2007 13:12:09 -0500
Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11])
	by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id MVG35828;
	Fri, 26 Jan 2007 13:11:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from 209-6-203-219.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO
	jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.203.219])
	by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 26 Jan 2007 13:11:50 -0500
From: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <17850.17413.363571.54932@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 13:10:13 -0500
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <200701261733.l0QHXdY1078259@lurza.secnetix.de>
References: <17850.11127.944124.276290@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
	<200701261733.l0QHXdY1078259@lurza.secnetix.de>
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5  (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid
X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net
X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown,
	refid=str=0001.0A090205.45BA4478.009F,ss=1,fgs=0,
	ip=207.172.4.11, so=2006-05-09 23:27:51,
	dmn=5.2.125/2006-10-10
Subject: Re: Interesting speed benchmarks
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 18:40:38 -0000


Oliver Fromme writes:

>  I'm not sure if dump(8) has been improved recently (I
>  confess that I haven't tried).  Maybe it is better now.
>  If you continue to use dump(8), make sure that you
>  specify a reasonable cache size (-C option).  Refer to
>  the manual page for details.  Without that option,
>  performance will be _really_ bad.

	I've made the adjustment and will see what happens.
	Thanks.


				Robert Huff