From owner-freebsd-emulation Sat Oct 13 13:25:50 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from kayak.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5A837B40B for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2001 13:25:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (athlon.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.3]) by kayak.xcllnt.net (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f9DKPjI92580; Sat, 13 Oct 2001 13:25:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@kayak.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (8.11.6/8.11.5) id f9DKPiL00508; Sat, 13 Oct 2001 13:25:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 13:25:44 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Martin Blapp Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Errors during staroffice6.0 tests Message-ID: <20011013132544.A406@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <20011012000714.R40931-100000@levais.imp.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20011012000714.R40931-100000@levais.imp.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 12:59:30AM +0200, Martin Blapp wrote: > > 1.) > > setup.bin: > > Display can do XRender, but no > libXrender.so installed. Please install for improved display performance > > If I make a symlink from : > > /compat/linux/usr/X11R6/libXrender.so.1 to libXrender.so > > and restart ldconfig, the warning goes away. Should we make such > symlink directly in the linux_base port ? Or is better to make a > symlink form the staroffice directory to this library ? linux_base-7 has all the symlinks: athlon% ls -al *render* ... 17890 Mar 30 2001 libXrender.a ... 17 Oct 3 21:17 libXrender.so -> libXrender.so.1.0 ... 17 Oct 3 20:48 libXrender.so.1 -> libXrender.so.1.0 ... 14612 Mar 30 2001 libXrender.so.1.0 linux_base(-6) doesn't have libXrender at all. > 2.) > > Oct 12 00:02:11 vaio /boot/kernel/kernel: linux: syscall chown is > obsoleted or not implemented (pid=2365) > Oct 12 00:02:11 vaio /boot/kernel/kernel: linux: syscall chown is > obsoleted or not implemented (pid=2365) > > Hmm, what about this one ? The syscall needs to be implemented. I simply didn't need it to get the port installed. It should be fairly trivial to do so. In fact I think it even maps directly to FreeBSD's native chown. > 3.) > > linux_stat64(0x84eb458,0xbfbfea50,0x84eb458) ERR#2 'No such file or > directory' > linux_stat64(0x84dbc40,0xbfbfe9a0,0x84dbc40) ERR#2 'No such file or > directory' > linux_unlink(0x85990f8) ERR#2 'No such file or > directory' > > Why is linux_stat64 used on a i386 machine ? It has nothing to do with the machines word/datapath width. The stat64 family of functions return structures that contain 64-bit datatypes for file sizes (and also 32-bit types for uids and gids). -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message