From owner-freebsd-bugs  Fri Apr 18 01:26:32 1997
Return-Path: <owner-bugs>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA18568
          for bugs-outgoing; Fri, 18 Apr 1997 01:26:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (wck-ca5-10.ix.netcom.com [199.35.213.170])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA18563
          for <freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Apr 1997 01:26:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.5/8.6.9) id BAA01118; Fri, 18 Apr 1997 01:26:13 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 01:26:13 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199704180826.BAA01118@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: rb@gid.co.uk
CC: kato@eclogite.eps.nagoya-u.ac.jp, freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <l03020901af7cd2bf56c0@[194.32.164.2]> (message from Bob Bishop on Fri, 18 Apr 1997 08:56:33 +0100)
Subject: Re: kern/3292: Cyrix 486 performance problem
From: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * From: Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk>

 * 			      If it doesn't run DOS properly, then we should
 * not expect it to run FreeBSD.

Do we really need to stoop THAT low? :)

Satoshi