From owner-freebsd-ports Mon May 28 22:57:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-122.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.122]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F4137B422 for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 22:57:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A059F675B2; Mon, 28 May 2001 22:57:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 22:57:53 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Ernst de Haan Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: XML-based ports system ? Message-ID: <20010528225753.C50483@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20010528105709.A9284@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WplhKdTI2c8ulnbP" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010528105709.A9284@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl>; from ernst@jollem.com on Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:57:09AM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --WplhKdTI2c8ulnbP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:57:09AM +0200, Ernst de Haan wrote: > Hey guys, >=20 > What are your ideas/opinions with respect to using XML for the ports syst= em? > *If* we want FreeBSD to be an XML-based OS in 5 years, then we could start > working towards that right now. IMHO it would be awesome if FreeBSD would > indeed use XML to replace a lot of custom file formats. >=20 > [1] Do you consider XML a useful file format? >=20 > [2] Do you consider it useful to replace a lot of custom file formats wit= h XML? >=20 > [3] Do you consider it an advantage if XML would be more closely integrat= ed in > FreeBSD? >=20 > [4] Do you consider it an advantage if a new ports system would be based = on > XML? I think the burden is probably on you to explain what the benefits of such a system would be and why it would be worthwhile to give up all the invested experience of working with the current system. I'm not saying such a thing wouldn't be useful, but it would need to be advocated well. The second step would be to produce a prototype implementation clearly showing the potential benefits. Kris --WplhKdTI2c8ulnbP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7EzpgWry0BWjoQKURAszmAKCDDnSXTLPgjpBqR46XYZosgZI10QCdFR0D cA4Ows+Byz8ImlMl9wRhC7Y= =M5Yd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WplhKdTI2c8ulnbP-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message