From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jan 21 16:04:16 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id QAA24159 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 16:04:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id QAA24150 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 16:04:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by root.com (8.7.6/8.6.5) with SMTP id QAA01837; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 16:01:26 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199701220001.QAA01837@root.com> X-Authentication-Warning: implode.root.com: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: "Brandon C. Wood" cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel Etherexpress Pro/10+ In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 21 Jan 1997 15:16:43 PST." From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 16:01:26 -0800 Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Does the Etherexpress Pro/100B PCI driver support the Etherexpress Pro/10+ >PCI card? Intel claims it's based on the same chip (in fact, in Windows >95 and NT it says to use the 100B driver, which works fine), and FreeBSD >seems to detect its parameters ok, but when I try to do an FTP install, it >fails to initialize the network interface. I know my tcp/ip settings are >correct, so I'm assuming it's a driver problem. The driver needs some minor changes to support the Pro/10+. If you can get FreeBSD installed some other way, contact me after you've done that and I can see about getting you a patch. -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project