Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 30 Nov 1998 19:14:31 +0000
From:      Andrew Boothman <andrew@sour.cream.org>
To:        Keyser Soze <mkultra@dqc.org>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD 3.0
Message-ID:  <3662EE97.DC84321A@sour.cream.org>
References:  <Pine.NEB.4.05.9811292044190.27954-100000@dqc.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Keyser Soze wrote:
> 
> Is FreeBSD 3.0 considered to be the new "STABLE" branch?
> I'm planning a new installation and was wondering which one to go with.

2.2.7 is the newest release, with 2.2.8 to be released shortly. After
2.2.8 the 2.2 development branch should be considered dead and will have
no major (if any) changes made to it.

Once the 3.0 branch is considered 'stable' enough (an I believe many
already consider it to be) it will have it's development shared between
two new -stable and -current branches, identically to how 2.2 used to.

I essence we are simply in transition between 2.2 and 3. -STABLE is
still 2.2 and -CURRENT is 3.

--
Andrew Boothman <andrew@sour.cream.org>
http://sour.cream.org/
http://www.boothman.easynet.co.uk/andrew/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3662EE97.DC84321A>