From owner-freebsd-security Wed Apr 14 9:34:50 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from puck.nether.net (puck.nether.net [204.42.254.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD0F15774 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 1999 09:34:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jared@puck.nether.net) Received: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.7.3) id MAA04706; Wed, 14 Apr 1999 12:32:20 -0400 (envelope-from jared) Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 12:32:20 -0400 From: Jared Mauch To: "Andy V. Oleynik" Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Sendmail up to 8.9.2 vulnerability Message-ID: <19990414123220.A4631@puck.nether.net> Mail-Followup-To: "Andy V. Oleynik" , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG References: <3714B71B.5420EB1F@prime.net.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.1i In-Reply-To: <3714B71B.5420EB1F@prime.net.ua>; from Andy V. Oleynik on Wed, Apr 14, 1999 at 06:41:17PM +0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org LA typically == Load Average. On Wed, Apr 14, 1999 at 06:41:17PM +0300, Andy V. Oleynik wrote: > Hi, everybody, > recently I've read about subj (src: http://www.rootshell.com/beta), > got a simple c-program to test my sendmail. > I'm running a test now, but what I would ask: > bugdiscoverer writes following in his msg: > " > If you noticed increased LA during attack, > your machine is vulnerable. > " > What does he mean under "LA"? > And may be some of U has appropriate patch for subj? > > -- > WBW Andy V. Oleynik (When U work in virtual office > U have good chance to obtain virtual money ?%-) > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message