From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Jul 1 11:25:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49EB037B400 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 11:25:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.noos.fr (lafontaine.noos.net [212.198.2.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C1543E26 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 11:25:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@gits.dyndns.org) Received: (qmail 9173735 invoked by uid 0); 1 Jul 2002 18:25:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gits.gits.dyndns.org) ([212.198.229.153]) (envelope-sender ) by 212.198.2.72 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 1 Jul 2002 18:25:13 -0000 Received: from gits.gits.dyndns.org (uxz9u8wwsfgwjopk@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gits.gits.dyndns.org (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g61IPCtY064076; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 20:25:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from root@gits.dyndns.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by gits.gits.dyndns.org (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) id g61IPBpJ064075; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 20:25:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from root) Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 20:25:11 +0200 From: Cyrille Lefevre To: Doug Barton Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RFC: Fate of /usr/share/doc/smm/10.named Message-ID: <20020701182511.GA63216@gits.dyndns.org> Mail-Followup-To: Cyrille Lefevre , Doug Barton , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org References: <3D1FFA5A.80B22BB6@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D1FFA5A.80B22BB6@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Organization: ACME X-Face: V|+c;4!|B?E%BE^{E6);aI.[< List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 11:44:42PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > I did the bind 8.3.3 import today, and nuked the doc/bog (BIND > Operator's Guide) directory because I couldn't find anywhere in the tree > where it was used. Well, I didn't look hard enough, because it was there > in /usr/src/share/doc/smm/10.named. The other reason I felt confident > removing it was that it's quite old, dating back to 1994-6, and > referencing BIND 4. > > To fix the build, I removed 10.named from the smm/Makefile temporarily. > I'd like to permanently remove it, since IMO it's no longer pertinent. > Opinions? IMHO, this doc isn't that much obsolete. only the part describing the top-level configuration file is, but the rest looks good. also, since there is no other online doc, I think it is better to left this one rather than nothing. also, as I remember me, some informations described here aren't described in the manual pages. so, I vote for keep it. Cyrille. -- Cyrille Lefevre mailto:cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message