From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 19 11:46:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4F11065672 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:46:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cemkayali@eticaret.com.tr) Received: from dolphin.defaultdns.com (dolphin.defaultdns.com [208.38.186.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DDA38FC13 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:46:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cemkayali@eticaret.com.tr) Received: from [85.100.124.6] (helo=[192.168.0.80]) by dolphin.defaultdns.com with esmtpsa (SSLv3:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1MHcYG-0001RA-Sb; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:46:38 +0000 Message-ID: <4A3B7A1A.4050603@eticaret.com.tr> Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:44:26 +0300 From: Cem Kayali User-Agent: Evolution 2.22.3.1 (X11/20080709) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: demuel@thephinix.org References: <735E59909DEB44AF92825EA7C65CF430@ionicoffice.ionic.co.uk> <00265389C30B444288C246DF37651D0C249024DD1B@server-02.playsafesa.com> <6101e8c40906190408h5b6a4496td12e2b9e4872459e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - dolphin.defaultdns.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [26 6] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - eticaret.com.tr Cc: misc@openbsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Open Vs Free BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:46:42 -0000 I agree. Thanks for reminding. I will not reply to this one anymore. Regards, Cem demuel@thephinix.org, 06/19/09 14:41: > Oh why can't this versus this versus that never dies? There had been > raging debate about which OSes is much better compared to the others since > time immemorial. Sure, each one has its own merits over the others and > vice versa. So why feeding this issue up since up to this very moment, > there is no winner. > > >> and the security is in netbsd: >> >> http://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi?security+8+NetBSD-5.0 >> http://www.netbsd.org/~elad/recent/recent06.pdf >> >> On 6/19/09, Ivan Voras wrote: >> >>> Kim Attree wrote: >>> >>> >>>> NetBSD runs on just about anything. That's it's primary goal. Since I >>>> don't >>>> have any weird hardware, I've never had a use for NetBSD. >>>> >>> I don't use NetBSD either but some recent development that come from >>> that camp are very interesting: >>> >>> * Journalling UFS ("smart" journalling, not gjournal) >>> * PUFFS (BSD implementation of FUSE-like system [file system in >>> userland]) >>> * They had Xen dom0 and domU for years >>> * They are starting to show decent results in SMP support, including a >>> new scheduler (a bit similar to ULE); their GENERIC has SMP included >>> * Possibly superpages, I'm not sure how to parse "Merged amd64 and i386 >>> pmap. Large pages are always used if available" >>> * I think they are working on their own ZFS port >>> * They have ported or reimplemented Linux LVM (read+write+admin) >>> >>> There are of course other things; see for example >>> http://www.netbsd.org/releases/formal-5/NetBSD-5.0.html >>> >>> I have a feeling the project has been revitalized in the last few years. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> > > >