From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Sep 18 7: 5:44 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE (r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5587037B407; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 07:05:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE (relay2.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.1]) by r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE (8.10.1/8.11.3-2) with ESMTP id f8IE5c609815; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 16:05:39 +0200 (MEST) Received: from kawoserv.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de (root@kawoserv.kawo2.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.180.1]) by r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE (8.10.1/8.11.3/6) with ESMTP id f8IE5cx09811; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 16:05:38 +0200 (MEST) Received: from fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de (root@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de [134.130.181.148]) by kawoserv.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA32682; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 16:05:36 +0200 Received: (from alex@localhost) by fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f8IE63F90901; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 16:06:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from alex) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 16:06:02 +0200 From: Alexander Langer To: Robert Withrow Cc: "Daniel O'Connor" , Jordan Hubbard , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, glenngombert@zdnetonebox.com Subject: Re: Version of XFree86 in FreeBSD Release 4.4 Message-ID: <20010918160602.B90244@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> References: <200109181358.JAA25623@pobox.engeast.BayNetworks.COM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200109181358.JAA25623@pobox.engeast.BayNetworks.COM>; from bwithrow@nortelnetworks.com on Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 09:58:11AM -0400 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 44 28 CA 4C 46 5B D3 A8 A8 E3 BA F3 4E 60 7D 7F X-PGP-at: finger alex@big.endian.de X-Verwirrung: Dieser Header dient der allgemeinen Verwirrung. Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thus spake Robert Withrow (bwithrow@nortelnetworks.com): > I know it is slimy, but couldn't there be a dummy "port" just > called "XFree86" that is what most other ports depend on? The minority > of ports that actually care what version of X is installed could always > use the version-specific names... Would be nice if we had a package system that lets you just install - let me call them - "features", such as a "XFree86" feature, other ports could depend on. Multiple packages could supply this feature then and ports could also say if they depend on a specific version. Alex, hiding in a dark corner. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message