Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:58:48 +0200
From:      Benjamin Lutz <benlutz@datacomm.ch>
To:        Eriq <admin@tigergroup.org>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 4.11 vs. 5.4 stablity
Message-ID:  <42E6C028.6020806@datacomm.ch>
In-Reply-To: <42E6BD98.1060300@tigergroup.org>
References:  <42E6BD98.1060300@tigergroup.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigB8A6A259800831E80FD08C17
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Eriq wrote:
> I am running 4.11 on a dual amd box and have found it solid as a rock
> for running apache2, postgres, dns and postfix. But now I am thinking
> of upgrading. I wonder if 5.4 is as stable  for these servers that
> must run 24/7. And is it worth all the trouble to do, I have grown
> pretty lazy :)

I'd go with that old saying, never touch a running system. 4.11 is still
going to be maintained for quite a long time, so if your machine runs
fine now, why not leave it as it is.

If you want to upgrade, maybe you should wait a bit longer and give 6.0
a closer look (set to be released in August at the moment). My current
impression is that it's stabler than 5.4 (but then, other people have
reported otherwise - I suppose it's somewhat hardware-dependent).

Cheers
Benjamin

--------------enigB8A6A259800831E80FD08C17
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFC5sAsgShs4qbRdeQRAkRiAJ9jM0unHmeJjh2aXIWzxXTUInO+VwCgjFdp
vOp6J9iot78TOaptd9MdBoU=
=+T5X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigB8A6A259800831E80FD08C17--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42E6C028.6020806>