From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jul 13 2:19:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from gateway.posi.net (c1096725-a.smateo1.sfba.home.com [24.20.139.104]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F79037C334 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 02:19:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kbyanc@posi.net) Received: from localhost (kbyanc@localhost) by gateway.posi.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA43967; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 02:25:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kbyanc@posi.net) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 02:25:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Kelly Yancey To: Andrzej Bialecki Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SysctlFS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, Andrzej Bialecki wrote: > Hi, > > I've been tweaking the sysctls here and there for some time now, and I'd > like to see what is the current opinion on implementing sysctl tree as a > filesystem. Most of the work I've done with dynamic sysctls is very > similar to what happens with filesystem. Also, filesystem model allows for > much more fine-grained access control. Arg. I've already been working on this in private. :/ Kelly -- Kelly Yancey - kbyanc@posi.net - Belmont, CA System Administrator, eGroups.com http://www.egroups.com/ Maintainer, BSD Driver Database http://www.posi.net/freebsd/drivers/ Coordinator, Team FreeBSD http://www.posi.net/freebsd/Team-FreeBSD/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message