From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 27 10:36:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA7F37B401 for ; Tue, 27 May 2003 10:36:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B25743F3F for ; Tue, 27 May 2003 10:36:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4RHaPVo040018 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 27 May 2003 13:36:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h4RHaOU7040015; Tue, 27 May 2003 13:36:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 13:36:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200305271736.h4RHaOU7040015@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mikko_Ty=F6l=E4j=E4rvi?= In-Reply-To: <20030526135441.U326@atlas.home> References: <20030526010717.98E8391682@vineyard.net> <3ED1CB03.8010005@fsn.hu> <20030526135441.U326@atlas.home> X-Spam-Score: -19.8 () IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.33 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A problem with too many network interfaces X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 17:36:27 -0000 < said: > A proper BSD port could use something like the trick in Stevens[1] and > keep retrying the call with a larger bufer until the length of the > result is the same as in the previous call. Actually, a proper BSD port would use the net.route.iflist sysctl instead. -GAWollman