From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 21:31:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE56D16A4B3 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 21:31:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web13401.mail.yahoo.com (web13401.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.175.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 328C643F3F for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 21:31:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from giffunip@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20031009043130.27525.qmail@web13401.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.91.194.1] by web13401.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 21:31:30 PDT Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 21:31:30 -0700 (PDT) From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20031009024834.GA5376@rot13.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: fsplit: BSD sources missing in the tree ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 04:31:30 -0000 --- Kris Kennaway wrote: ... > > The CVS log refers to discussion on -current. If you had looked that > up you would have found that the utilities were moved to the > fortran-utils port. > You could've just said that ... I was starting an fsplit port! The log only said this: ___________________ Revision 1.2, Wed Dec 22 14:30:41 1999 UTC (3 years, 9 months ago) by kris Branch: MAIN CVS Tags: HEAD Changes since 1.1: +0 -0 lines FILE REMOVED Say goodbye to some crufty old fortran code. Reviewed by: current ___________________ hmm.. at least I learned that "reviewed by" has a deep significance in FreeBSD. cheers, Pedro. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com