Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:49:29 +0600 From: "Vadim Goncharov" <vadim_nuclight@mail.ru> To: "Julian Elischer" <julian@elischer.org>, dima <_pppp@mail.ru> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TCP Projects for 8.0 - first cut wiki page Message-ID: <opt3nc8rfr17d6mn@nuclight.avtf.net> In-Reply-To: <476AB68C.30201@elischer.org> References: <20071220135342.O67327@fledge.watson.org> <E1J5Pxt-0004O8-00._pppp-mail-ru@f59.mail.ru> <476AB68C.30201@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
21.12.07 @ 00:38 Julian Elischer wrote: >> As I know, we have a single swi:net thread in the kernel yet. Are >> there any plans to make several such threads? If yes, this activity >> isn't mentioned in wiki. >> There are 2 ideas: >> 1. per-core thread >> 2. per-interface thread >> I like the second more. > > and for my system with 64 virtual interfaces? Surely, per-core thread is enough - why have too much synchronization overhead?.. A computer is a state machine. Threads are for people who can't program state machines. (c) Alan Cox -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?opt3nc8rfr17d6mn>