From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 22 18:22:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D703316A4CE for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 18:22:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0D9843D55 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 18:22:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iAMINVtQ024717; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:23:31 -0800 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id iAMINVmY024716; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:23:31 -0800 Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:23:31 -0800 From: Brooks Davis To: Eric Masson Message-ID: <20041122182331.GB20652@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <867joeau4r.fsf@srvbsdnanssv.interne.kisoft-services.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GRPZ8SYKNexpdSJ7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <867joeau4r.fsf@srvbsdnanssv.interne.kisoft-services.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on odin.ac.hmc.edu cc: Mailing List FreeBSD Network Subject: Re: gif4) & AltQ X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 18:22:34 -0000 --GRPZ8SYKNexpdSJ7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 02:30:28PM +0100, Eric Masson wrote: > Hello, >=20 > In a vpn application, I'm using gif tunnels backed by ipsec transport > mode beetween two hosts on the Internet. >=20 > Is there any hope to see gif(4) modified to integrate AltQ framework or > is there any reason (except lack of maintainer/coder time) that would be > a showstopper ? I'm not sure ALTQ makes sense on a gif interface. ALTQ's operation depends on being fairly close to the point where packets hit the wire and gif is quite a ways from there (since it's riding on top of IP). I don't think there would be any objection to adding support, but gif does not have have a maintainer so you'd have to convince someone to find it intresting (or figure it out yourself.) I gather the changes aren't all that complex in general. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --GRPZ8SYKNexpdSJ7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBoi6iXY6L6fI4GtQRAl9gAJ9TJPlBewpI4cOEYl77a9GfpgIOeACeOQfQ g01QazHiTFl5yN+SQY2ky6M= =nRNl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GRPZ8SYKNexpdSJ7--