From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 24 2:49: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtppzh.pzh.nl (webshield.pzh.nl [194.178.168.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D64D214C09 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 02:49:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from MULHUIJZEN@PZH.NL) Received: FROM smtp.pzh.nl BY smtppzh.pzh.nl ; Mon Jan 24 11:48:04 2000 0000 Received: from PZH40-1-Message_Server by smtp.pzh.nl with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 11:48:10 +0100 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2 Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 11:47:59 +0100 From: "ROGIER MULHUIJZEN" To: , Subject: Re: Multiple IP addresses Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >The scenario I have setup is as follows, the server (xl0) has been assigned >the IP address of yyy.yyy.yyy.8 and the I route an entire Class C to that >interface in the router, e.g. >ip route xxx.xxx.xxx.0 255.255.255.0 yyy.yyy.yyy.8 BTW, I'm just being curious here, why would you want to bind an entire class C subnet to a single machine? To me it seems like a total waste of precious real estate (until IPv6 becomes the standard). DocWilco To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message