From owner-freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org  Mon Feb 10 13:38:06 2020
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6581923AA75
 for <freebsd-ipfw@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
 Mon, 10 Feb 2020 13:38:06 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from lutz@donnerhacke.de)
Received: from annwfn.iks-jena.de (annwfn.iks-jena.de [IPv6:2001:4bd8::19])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48GRms28sQz4VVq
 for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 13:38:04 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from lutz@donnerhacke.de)
X-SMTP-Sender: IPv6:2001:4bd8:59:1:172:27:107:102
Received: from lyoness (lyoness.intern.iks-service.de
 [IPv6:2001:4bd8:59:1:172:27:107:102])
 by annwfn.iks-jena.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 01ADc1c6006349;
 Mon, 10 Feb 2020 14:38:01 +0100
From: "Lutz Donnerhacke" <lutz@donnerhacke.de>
To: "'Marco van Tol'" <marco@tols.org>, <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
References: <496FAA63-FDFC-4068-BC6A-3556BC749BEF@tols.org>
In-Reply-To: <496FAA63-FDFC-4068-BC6A-3556BC749BEF@tols.org>
Subject: AW: [SPAM:1.5] ipfw nat64lsn <name> stats / collectd
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 14:38:00 +0100
Message-ID: <001001d5e017$503f8f30$f0bead90$@donnerhacke.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: de
Thread-Index: AQHbG5y/ACE/OTeEovmqS8fDWNo5dKgJ9wtQ
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48GRms28sQz4VVq
X-Spamd-Bar: /
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none;
 spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of lutz@donnerhacke.de has no SPF policy
 when checking 2001:4bd8::19) smtp.mailfrom=lutz@donnerhacke.de
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.45 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.94)[-0.936,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[];
 TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.41)[-0.406,0];
 MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[];
 DMARC_NA(0.00)[donnerhacke.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[];
 TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2];
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[9.1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.8.d.b.4.1.0.0.2.list.dnswl.org
 : 127.0.5.0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
 R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:15725, ipnet:2001:4bd8::/29, country:DE];
 MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[];
 IP_SCORE(-0.00)[country: DE(-0.02)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions <freebsd-ipfw.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ipfw>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 13:38:06 -0000

> The alternative is to pipe the output of "ipfw nat64lsn <name> stats"
through
> something, but I was hoping to prevent needing to do that :)

Please stick to this approach for your project.
I do not see the benefit for others by extending the kernel source.