From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb 23 08:52:20 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D0DA016A4CF; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 08:52:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gw.celabo.org (gw.celabo.org [208.42.49.153])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A469143D1F; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 08:52:20 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from nectar@celabo.org)
Received: from madman.celabo.org (madman.celabo.org [10.0.1.111])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "madman.celabo.org", Issuer "celabo.org CA" (verified OK))
	by gw.celabo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3870C54883; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:52:20 -0600 (CST)
Received: by madman.celabo.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id EBE066D455; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:52:19 -0600 (CST)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:52:19 -0600
From: Jacques Vidrine <nectar@freebsd.org>
To: Valentin Nechayev <netch@ivb.nn.kiev.ua>
Message-ID: <20040223165219.GB77099@madman.celabo.org>
References: <200402202346.i1KNkbkI013945@green.homeunix.org>
	<20040222080920.GA359@iv.nn.kiev.ua>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040222080920.GA359@iv.nn.kiev.ua>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i-ja.1
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Testers wanted: reentrant resolver
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:52:21 -0000

[Resending:  problems at mx1.freebsd.org rejected this message
 yesterday.]

Valentin Nechayev said the following on 2/22/04 2:09 AM:
> The main question: why do you do it this way instead of import of newer
> ISC resolver which already has thread-safe resolver without any requirement
> of TLS? 

Bringing in new resolver is still on the menu.  Brian's work doesn't
interfere.

Cheers,
-- 
Jacques Vidrine / nectar@celabo.org / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@freebsd.org