From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 06:21:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB101065672 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 06:21:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevenschlansker@berkeley.edu) Received: from gateway0.EECS.Berkeley.EDU (gateway0.EECS.Berkeley.EDU [169.229.60.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4EC48FC25 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 06:21:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevenschlansker@berkeley.edu) Received: from emu.stevenschlansker.is-a-geek.org (66-117-142-212.lmi.net [66.117.142.212]) (authenticated bits=0) by gateway0.EECS.Berkeley.EDU (8.14.3/8.13.5) with ESMTP id m8G6LRJU026284 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:21:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <6FB40451-1CBC-4FD2-ACA5-FF594E1E3F5C@berkeley.edu> From: Steven Schlansker To: swell.k@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <8663oxvuaf.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:21:21 -0700 References: <3A22C890-8724-4A41-8E67-2F6A8D4D7E3C@berkeley.edu> <8663oxvuaf.fsf@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pjd's ZFS 2008-07-27 patches against HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 06:21:28 -0000 On Sep 15, 2008, at 4:55 PM, swell.k@gmail.com wrote: > Steven Schlansker writes: > >> so I decided to try out -CURRENT with the >> latest ZFS patches. > > Revisions before r182371 should work. Or you can try -CURRENT > some later time when pjd commit[1] his work on latest zfs version. > > [1] http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080829074738.GB3026 > >> >> I was wondering if there is a newer patch out there (I don't see >> anything in ~pjd/patches) or if anyone has had any luck getting the >> patch to apply cleanly to the latest sources. > > http://pastebin.com/m30db3356 > > I've just copied `+' lines from p4 and `-' lines from svn, nothing > special. Try it at your own risk and don't blame me if you lose > your precious data. ;) So far I haven't lost mine, although I have > a bad experience with zfs metadata corruption in the past with > and without pjd's patch. > > Another way is just collect and revert conflicting commits then apply > the patch without modifying it. I've already lost count how many there > are to revert. Hm. I think I'll just wait until it hits HEAD before upgrading - I like my data ;) Thanks for the mailing list link - I hadn't found that before. Hopefully it will be committed soon! Thanks, Steven