From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Feb 12 2:59:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de (dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.243.252]) by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0162D3E8D for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2000 02:59:49 -0800 (PST) Received: (from olli@localhost) by dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA93132; Sat, 12 Feb 2000 11:59:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from olli) Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2000 11:59:45 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200002121059.LAA93132@dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Wimchip CPU X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <882d7e$g2n$1@atlantis.rz.tu-clausthal.de> User-Agent: tin/1.4.1-19991201 ("Polish") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/3.4-19991219-STABLE (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG MrWho wrote in list.freebsd-questions: > When compiling FreeBSD on a Winchip CPU, should I choose 486 or 586 > optimizations on the kernel? This shell command should tell you: grep class /var/run/dmesg.boot Well... If in doubt, you can simply include both 486-class and 586-class support. It doesn't hurt, except that it might make your kernel a few bytes bigger, but it's not really significant. Regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, Leibnizstr. 18/61, 38678 Clausthal, Germany (Info: finger userinfo:olli@dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de) "In jedem Stück Kohle wartet ein Diamant auf seine Geburt" (Terry Pratchett) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message