From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Dec 4 15:12:18 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 242BFC67CDE for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2016 15:12:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from smtp3.irishbroadband.ie (smtp3.irishbroadband.ie [62.231.32.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D442DCC2 for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2016 15:12:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from [89.127.62.20] (helo=smtp.lan.sohara.org) by smtp3.irishbroadband.ie with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1cDY00-0002ef-08 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2016 14:42:40 +0000 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.lan.sohara.org) by smtp.lan.sohara.org with smtp (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1cDGwg-000Nlx-M5 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2016 20:30:06 +0000 Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2016 20:29:25 +0000 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Replies to spam Message-Id: <20161203202925.2088c4436589021710e6ea29@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20161124123456.056654ff@archlinux.localdomain> <20161124171051.GA32472@becker.bs.l> <3E.0D.19237.9CB8A385@dnvrco-omsmta01> <20161127085920.3dc07007@moonstudio> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.1) X-Clacks-Overhead: "GNU Terry Pratchett" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2016 15:12:18 -0000 On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 09:14:51 -0700 (MST) Warren Block wrote: > The volume of posts to -questions from new users has not been very high > for years. To me, that does not seem like a compelling reason to keep > the list open to posting without subscription. The policy along with the reply-all convention is common to all the FreeBSD lists AFAIK and is convenient for the occasional question to the more specialised lists. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith