From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 23 15:16:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B38220A; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:16:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A21E2DEB; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:16:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r7NFGMFf047082; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 08:16:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r7NFGMZ8047081; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 08:16:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 08:16:22 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Boris Samorodov Subject: Re: GCC withdraw (was: Re: patch to add AES intrinsics to gcc) Message-ID: <20130823151622.GA46958@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20130822200902.GG94127@funkthat.com> <105E26EE-8471-49D3-AB57-FBE2779CF8D0@FreeBSD.org> <5217413A.9080105@passap.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5217413A.9080105@passap.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: toolchain@FreeBSD.org, John-Mark Gurney , David Chisnall , current@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:16:26 -0000 On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 03:02:18PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > 23.08.2013 13:16, David Chisnall ??????????: > >> I have a patch that I intend to commit before the 10.0 code >> slush that removes GCC and libstdc++ from the default build >> on platforms where clang is the system compiler. We definitely >> don't want to be supporting our 6-year-old versions of these >> for the lifetime of the 10.x branch. > > Isn't it a POLA violation? > > As for me I expect something like this: > . 9.x gcc default and clang in base; > . 10.x clang default and gcc in base; > . 11.x gcc withdraw. > +1 -- Steve