Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:10:49 -0700 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: user <user@dhp.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: three follow-up questions RE: UFS2 snapshots on large filesystems Message-ID: <4374DEA9.9020706@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0511111150460.8180-100000@shell.dhp.com> References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0511111150460.8180-100000@shell.dhp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
user wrote: > > thank you scott - see below: > > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Scott Long wrote: > > >>The UFS snapshot code was written at a time when disks were typically >>around 4-9GB in size, not 400GB in size =-) Unfortunately, the amount >>of time it takes to do the initial snapshot bookkeeping scales linearly >>with the size of the drive, and many people have reported that it takes >>considerable amount of time (anywhere from several minutes to several >>dozen minutes) on large drives/arrays like you describe. So, you should >>test and plan accordingly if you are interested in using them. > > > > Testing is what I need to do. I have a few follow up questions: > > First, are there any sysctl or kernel tunables that change any of what you > are discussing above ? There doesn't appear to be any tunables in the snapshot code other than for debugging. > > Second, let's say I am willing to accept the long snapshot creation period > ... are there other drawbacks as well during the course of _running with_ > the snapshot once it is created ? Or are all costs paid initially ? There is a slight performance penalty from tracking block changes and copying them to the snapshot file. It's fairly small, though, not enough to impact normal use. > > Finally, I have read the bsdcon3 paper that mccusick wrote where he > addressed the dual problems of not enough kernel memory (10 megabytes) to > cache disk pages, and the system deadlocking that occurs with two > snapshots. Is it true that both of the fixes he elucidated in that paper > are built into what I see as fbsd 5.4 now ? > That I do not know. There have been a number of deadlock fixes in over the past few years, and some a few months ago in particular, but I haven't tracked them closely enough to know. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4374DEA9.9020706>