From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Jan 5 16:47:58 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B83A4C2742 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 16:47:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-qt1-x835.google.com (mail-qt1-x835.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::835]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D9JMf2Kj8z4kCb for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 16:47:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-qt1-x835.google.com with SMTP id z20so108469qtq.3 for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 08:47:58 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=a9gjymWuyICYHrib//iUOGiptwsatH6qQ1RJKWlw3hk=; b=oG6UTv+8ctHWg0nnnbLWTaD1WMJT57SwCjvSwfkjNSKEBmVni5X3N3QgSyOoPFHOm9 XkV38NhbvE/I7G+l6nUomX8/EKBfETQ4o7QL9Js7rq19jroJ9FY96XpEmK/YKhCtD440 3b/K2ZvL7G8FfkmBU7mNZcb6oo5wHgqCMqJXiUfKpLmhLj21HLdHcoUUUPa0uYBIf5dV 1eG19ZZ8f3GVWXqW9K7I4krkdFqiklv76PMfNp+miRBHrrGb8e1nrDZCTmv9W1vA9IK0 TWv4mBOq0Aw05axem6CgtMjQROIqOzUrAkTGIvcfjEuK55nNH/HTSscsceSerIokZh17 OTMg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533FKRy5M89/w0KxC+4RWBylI4f1gZUp2w8u1RHo1IjzEVcmuAAD R/Z55oIYA9C5B88Z+zSGJPVrZKT38UyJHcX+poAsOQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxKggkRjfKRZMo0AnSm/ozhkSHDA9lVcKjTPCQQsGulivF1t6NMZFmIhffaj4t97HmIDO1PFMG6M6NPLIWBWNA= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4910:: with SMTP id e16mr360114qtq.244.1609865276039; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 08:47:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <94447.1609779520@critter.freebsd.dk> <94622.1609782682@critter.freebsd.dk> <202101051308.105D8IMh060928@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> In-Reply-To: <202101051308.105D8IMh060928@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> From: Warner Losh Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 09:47:45 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: git non-time-sequential logs To: Jamie Landeg-Jones Cc: Ryan Libby , John Kennedy , Poul-Henning Kamp , FreeBSD Current , Alan Somers X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4D9JMf2Kj8z4kCb X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 16:47:58 -0000 On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 6:08 AM Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote: > Ryan Libby wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 10:08 AM Warner Losh wrote: > > ... > > > As for date order, we could also add a commit hook that requires the > date > > > to be properly set, but that creates friction for developers. Is that > > > friction worth the benefits? I don't think so, but as you say we could > also > > > add notes... but since there's no checkout by date feature, I'm not > sure > > > what good it would do. > > > > Not a vote one way or the other, but it would at least make > > git log --since more meaningful. > > Not having timestamps on files cloned or viewed in cgit.freebsd.org is a > nightmare too. > I just clicked through and saw several time stamps quite trivially. Could you be more specific in your complaint? Warner