From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Feb 17 04:10:06 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA11192
          for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Tue, 17 Feb 1998 04:10:06 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.119.24.10])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA11069
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 17 Feb 1998 04:09:59 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net)
Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [194.198.43.36])
	by ns1.yes.no (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA05862;
	Tue, 17 Feb 1998 12:09:57 GMT
Received: (from eivind@localhost)
	by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.6/8.8.6) id NAA14134;
	Tue, 17 Feb 1998 13:09:57 +0100 (MET)
Message-ID: <19980217130957.45413@follo.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 13:09:57 +0100
From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no>
To: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ed overwrite clue?
References: <19980217122904.27594@follo.net> <199802171140.DAA01667@dingo.cdrom.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1i
In-Reply-To: <199802171140.DAA01667@dingo.cdrom.com>; from Mike Smith on Tue, Feb 17, 1998 at 03:40:24AM -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Tue, Feb 17, 1998 at 03:40:24AM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
> > I'm not certain about anything right now - I started reproducing this
> > about an hour ago.  It might even be a hardware failure (but I've
> > tried with different cards of the same type, and all fail, while a
> > Kingston Ne2000-clone works flawlessly).
> 
> That in particular is kinda odd.  What NIC is the Kingston card using? 
> Is it a "real" 8390x, or another clone?

It's another clone.  It is marked with
Kingston
EtheRx LC
KTC 8890-AXCM

> I have the RTL8019 documentation around here somewhere; it's in an odd 
> format that I didn't get to print (a self-extracting nonstandard-format 
> Windows executable I think).  If you're really stuffed let me know and 
> I'll dig it out.

Thanks for the offer!  (I don't need it yet, but might need it if
everything goes west).

> One question; the destination of the insw - is that actually a
> legitimate address?  ie. is it on the kernel stack, or somewhere
> else?

It looks like the destination is on the kernel stack.  The source
looks more suspicious - it is at 0x6200...

Eivind.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message