From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 21 23:22:08 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 174BA37B401 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 23:22:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (pcwin002.win.tue.nl [131.155.71.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184A743FDD for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 23:22:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (orb_rules@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h3M6LqVo018135; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 08:21:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: (from stijn@localhost) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h3M6LqGS018134; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 08:21:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 08:21:52 +0200 From: Stijn Hoop To: "."@babolo.ru Message-ID: <20030422062152.GA18011@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <003b01c307f5$8c936e00$0480763e@semhome> <1050982709.421032.879.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ibTvN161/egqYuK8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1050982709.421032.879.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Bright-Idea: Let's abolish HTML mail! cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: portupgrade & RO ports tree (was Re: [kris@freebsd.org: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.port.mk]) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 06:22:08 -0000 --ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 07:38:29AM +0400, "."@babolo.ru wrote: > > Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > > Hm, execuse me my sarcasm, but do we really need the second portupgra= de > > > in C??? > >=20 > > I see two main reasons: > > 1) portupgrade is not in base system and never be there because of ruby. > > 2) Because it is in ruby :) > 3) Because it do not works on RO mounted /usr/ports It does. I have always run it in such a setup. --Stijn --=20 "Linux has many different distributions, meaning that you can probably find one that is exactly what you want (I even found one that looked like a Unix system)." -- Mike Meyer, from a posting at questions@freebsd.org --ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+pN+AY3r/tLQmfWcRAmsoAJ47zrJEEswSQfAZquYUyrFV0SGb6wCgpQXS NXEOXL3vRPnH/0B+ZsUGvRM= =yGrR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ibTvN161/egqYuK8--