From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 12 16:12:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE5316A4CE for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:12:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pinus.cc.fer.hr (pinus.cc.fer.hr [161.53.73.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E4043D2D for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:12:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from [161.53.72.113] (lara.cc.fer.hr [161.53.72.113]) by pinus.cc.fer.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id j0CGOJ5B013611 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:24:20 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <41E54C51.4000300@fer.hr> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:12:01 +0100 From: Ivan Voras User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041213) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: current@freebsd.org References: <41DF253C.5040705@fer.hr> <20050108005540.GB93568@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050108030707.GA3656@frontfree.net> <20050108034424.GA94365@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20050108034424.GA94365@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: MFC wishlist X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:12:06 -0000 Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 11:07:07AM +0800, Xin LI wrote: > >>On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 04:55:40PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: >> >>>On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 01:11:40AM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: >>> >>>>It's been a while now and (judging from this list at least), people are >>>>not complaining about ULE, so maybe (with re@ approval) the fix & >>>>supporting infrastructure could be brought to RELENG_5? >>>> >>> >>>That's not a good idea. I can lock up ULE+PREEMPTION on >>This is observed in pre-5.3RELEASE CURRENT, but I thought Jeff has > I'm talking about 6-CURRENT. My last kernel/world build is Are there plans for assigning more priority/resources on solving this? Maybe mark it as show-stopper for 5.4? (it's currently not even on the http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/todo.html list)