From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 12:40:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD8A1065694 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 12:40:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.cksoft.de (mail.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 371728FC08 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 12:40:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ACED41C6DB; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:40:05 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cksoft.de Received: from mail.cksoft.de ([62.111.66.27]) by localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3HHzjCGidxo7; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:40:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 1E9AA41C6BB; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:40:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C2EE44487F; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 12:39:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 12:39:13 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: Steven Hartland In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081001123437.K7528@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: X-OpenPGP-Key: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple IPS - Freebsd 7.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 12:40:06 -0000 On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, Steven Hartland wrote: Hi, > I would dearly like to see this make the 7.1 release, multi IP's in order > to support backend interfaces in jails, is something that we hit against > all the time. Whatever your wishes or backends are, the multi-IP jail patches will NOT be in 7.1-RELEASE. full stop. You will need the patch. full stop. So I am trying to get it into HEAD at the moment and in 2 months or so once 7.1-R is out and things have settled in HEAD we can waste thoughts on MFCing it to 7-STABLE so it could be in 7.2-R. I cannot garantuee it will happen as the patch is intrusive and cannot keep the KPI. The best thing you can do until then is to actually take the patch, test it, report problems, ... /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb Stop bit received. Insert coin for new game.