Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 09:24:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> To: Norbert Aschendorff <norbert.aschendorff@yahoo.de> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: panic "Sleeping thread owns a non-sleepable lock" via cv_timedwait_signal, was "rsync over NFS" Message-ID: <37099006.1631279.1349270651574.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> In-Reply-To: <506BFECE.3020006@yahoo.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Norbert Aschendorff wrote: > Another logs - even with a /var/crash crash report :) > > Please note: The /var/crash files stem from another crash than the big > syslog does! > > The syslog file inside the tarball is about 4.7 MB; it contains > everything since the start of the crash. > > New /var/crash files: > http://lbo.spheniscida.de/Files/nfs-rsync-crash-witnessII.tgz > New syslog file: > http://lbo.spheniscida.de/Files/nfs-rsync-crash-witnessIII-only-messages.tgz > > (Both < 100 KB) > > The used kernel is called GENERIC-OWN-WITNESS and has all three > WITNESS > options enabled and nothing else. > I'll take a look at these later to-day. > But I just get an idea: Should I try it without Rick's NFSv4 > numeric-uid-gid patch? Or is that completely unrelated? > @Rick: Can you assure that it is impossible that the patch added this > bug? Doesn't seem likely, but I'd never guarantee that a patch isn't broken and/or can never have weird side effects. So, it might be worth trying backing the patch out and seeing if it still crashes. Thanks for doing this testing, rick > > --norbert > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37099006.1631279.1349270651574.JavaMail.root>