From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 25 07:35:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A39BD16A407 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 07:35:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (eva.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.176.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F013043D5C for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 07:35:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (envelope-from xdivac02@eva.fit.vutbr.cz) (8.13.8/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k9P7ZCGb090413 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 25 Oct 2006 09:35:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from xdivac02@localhost) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.13.8/8.13.3/Submit) id k9P7ZBfY090412; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 09:35:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 09:35:11 +0200 From: Divacky Roman To: kreios@gmail.com Message-ID: <20061025073511.GA90244@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <2de4f2a00610241959l7a96ed59je79fb3e978f2c3d9@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2de4f2a00610241959l7a96ed59je79fb3e978f2c3d9@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 147.229.176.14 Cc: performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DNS Performance Numbers X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 07:35:14 -0000 On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 09:59:57PM -0500, kreios@gmail.com wrote: > I am running some performance tests on named to see how it performs > with different configurations on FreeBSD and figured I would share the > first results. The first tests are for serving up static data. > > System: > Supermicro PDSMi Motherboard > 1G Memory > Intel Pentium D CPU 3.40GHz > Intel Gigibit NIC > Bind 9.2.3 > > OS UP UP+P MP MP+P MP+TP MP+TT MP+TP+P > MP+TT+P > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > FreeBSD 4.11 28455 28370 28976 X X X X X > FreeBSD 6.1 29074 34260 34635 35730 17846 38780 19776 > 44188 > FreeBSD Stable 30190 34707 33294 36651 18893 39374 19449 > 44169 > FreeBSD Current 30707 34029 32300 33689 15535 40554 13886 > 42071 > Ubuntu 6.06 X X X X X 37294 X X I see regression between -current and -stable. are you sure you tested without any debuging stuff? some performance speedups went in in 7-current also - do you use the same config everywhere? -current GENERIC doesnt have COMPAT_43 for example which miht affect performance (additional locking) etc. roman