Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 09 Jun 2012 14:08:52 -0400
From:      George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: boot menu option to disable graphics mode
Message-ID:  <4FD39134.7040108@m5p.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120609143739.GB67878@DataIX.net>
References:  <4FD05C16.9040905@FreeBSD.org> <20120607084738.GT85127@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4FD06CD3.3080602@FreeBSD.org> <20120607095741.GA1361@reks> <4FD07D11.9030002@FreeBSD.org> <20120609011630.GA48866@DataIX.net> <4FD2D102.4070103@FreeBSD.org> <20120609143739.GB67878@DataIX.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06/09/12 10:37, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 07:28:50AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 09/06/2012 04:16 Jason Hellenthal said the following:
>>> runlevel support might be a better solution so it does not differ that
>>> much from what other systems do and would be easy for people to grasp.
>> Patches are welcome, as always.
>>
> I agree... ;)
>
> How about generic runlevel support through kenv instead ?

I've wondered whether it would be more "BSD-sh" to specify a way to tell
init, "Tell /etc/rc to run the scripts listed by rcorder up until we get
NETWORKING."  (Or SERVERS or whatever dependency you need, or "Stop
just before LOGIN".)                                  -- George Mitchell
>
>
> Set runlevel by default to 3 , where just like any other system is
> multiuser, and provide support in the rc scripts to look at kenv. While
> documenting "runlevel" in init(8)'s man page since that is where most
> people look for these things.
>
>
> This way a we could define a while bunch of things around generic
> runlevels and if perhaps runlevels ever make it into FreeBSD the support
> for them will already exist.
>
>




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FD39134.7040108>